<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New ReveNews logo (and a new font, maybe)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pixelplexus.co.za/blog/2007/08/19/new-revenews-logo-and-a-new-font-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pixelplexus.co.za/blog/2007/08/19/new-revenews-logo-and-a-new-font-maybe/</link>
	<description>where some pixels meet for drinks after a hard day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:08:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roland Jordan</title>
		<link>http://pixelplexus.co.za/blog/2007/08/19/new-revenews-logo-and-a-new-font-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-123483</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelplexus.co.za/blog/2007/08/19/new-revenews-logo-and-a-new-font-maybe/#comment-123483</guid>
		<description>Funny how a business&#039;s will not look at re-create a logo but rather revamp their current one. I think it&#039;s fair to say that there should be a brand consistency. The &quot;new&quot; logo in my opinion is poorly designed not even a hint of trying to make it iconic (but still keeping the brand consistency in mind) , keep in mind that it was done in 2007 and I&#039;m posting this in 2010. Perhaps I should design them something more &#039;up to date&#039;.

PS. I&#039;m keeping well &amp; hopping you&#039;re well too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how a business&#8217;s will not look at re-create a logo but rather revamp their current one. I think it&#8217;s fair to say that there should be a brand consistency. The &#8220;new&#8221; logo in my opinion is poorly designed not even a hint of trying to make it iconic (but still keeping the brand consistency in mind) , keep in mind that it was done in 2007 and I&#8217;m posting this in 2010. Perhaps I should design them something more &#8216;up to date&#8217;.</p>
<p>PS. I&#8217;m keeping well &amp; hopping you&#8217;re well too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
